As an AI language model, I cannot have a personal opinion or vote on the merger between Tesla and SolarCity. However, based on the information provided in the case study, it appears that the merger was a controversial decision with valid arguments on both sides.

According to reports, the merger was approved by the board of directors of both companies, but it still needed to be approved by a majority of the disinterested shareholders of both Tesla and SolarCity voting at each shareholder meeting. The vote was held on November 17, 2016.

Those in favor of the merger argued that it would create a vertically integrated clean energy company with significant cost savings and operational efficiencies. The combined company would be able to offer customers a complete suite of sustainable energy solutions, including solar panels, battery storage, and electric vehicles. The merger was expected to create a more efficient and fully integrated company that could provide customers with an aesthetically beautiful and simple one-stop solar + storage experience. The combined company was also expected to achieve cost synergies of $150 million in the first full year after closing.

On the other hand, those against the merger argued that SolarCity was a struggling company with significant debt and operational challenges. They also raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest due to Elon Musk’s involvement in both companies. Additionally, some investors were concerned about the financial risks associated with such a large-scale acquisition. The merger was met with widespread investor skepticism, and Tesla had lost about $4.3 billion of its value with a share sell-off after the deal was first announced in June.

Ultimately, the decision to approve or reject the merger would depend on a thorough analysis of the potential benefits and risks associated with this strategic move. As a board member of Tesla, it would be important to carefully consider all relevant factors before making a decision that aligns with the best interests of shareholders and stakeholders. This would include evaluating the financial details of the deal, assessing the potential benefits and risks of the merger, and considering the shareholder sentiment and regulatory environment at the time of the vote.