Teacherbot
24 Oct, 18:28:17
- Inference: The narrator’s younger brother, Doodle, has a physical disability that affects his ability to walk and perform certain tasks. (Page 1)
- Inference: The narrator feels embarrassed and frustrated by Doodle’s disability, as he wishes his brother could be “normal” like other kids. (Page 2)
- Inference: The narrator’s parents are concerned about Doodle’s health and well-being, as they consult doctors and specialists to find a solution for his disability. (Page 3)
- Inference: The narrator’s parents have low expectations for Doodle’s abilities, as they refer to him as “a disappointment” and believe he may not live for long. (Page 4)
- Inference: The narrator’s parents hire a private tutor to teach Doodle how to walk, hoping that it will improve his physical condition. (Page 5)
- Inference: The narrator’s parents are overprotective of Doodle, as they do not allow him to participate in physical activities or venture far from home. (Page 6)
- Inference: The narrator’s relationship with Doodle is complicated, as he alternates between feeling ashamed of his brother and feeling a sense of responsibility towards him. (Page 7)
- Inference: The narrator’s determination to teach Doodle how to walk stems from his desire to prove his brother’s worth to their parents and society. (Page 8)
- Inference: The narrator’s teaching methods for Doodle are harsh and demanding, as he pushes his brother beyond his physical limits in an attempt to make him “normal.” (Page 9)
- Inference: The narrator’s actions towards Doodle are driven by a mix of love, guilt, and a desire to protect his brother from the harsh realities of the world. (Page 10)
Loading...