Introduction:

Pluto has been a topic of debate for many years. Some people believe that it should be considered a planet, while others argue that it should not. In this report, we will explore the reasons behind both arguments and come to a conclusion on whether Pluto should be considered a planet.

Paragraph 1:

Pluto was discovered in 1930 and was considered a planet for many years. However, in 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) reclassified Pluto as a “dwarf planet.” This decision was made because Pluto did not meet the three criteria that the IAU had set for a planet. These criteria are that a planet must orbit the sun, be spherical in shape, and have cleared its orbit of other debris. Pluto failed to meet the third criterion, as it shares its orbit with other objects in the Kuiper Belt.

Paragraph 2:

Despite the IAU’s decision, many people still believe that Pluto should be considered a planet. They argue that the criteria set by the IAU are too strict and that Pluto should be given special consideration. They also point out that Pluto is larger than some other objects in the solar system that are considered planets, such as Mercury. Additionally, Pluto has five known moons, which is more than some other planets.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, while there are arguments on both sides, it is clear that Pluto does not meet the criteria set by the IAU for a planet. Therefore, it is appropriate to classify Pluto as a “dwarf planet.” However, it is important to remember that the classification of objects in space is constantly evolving as we learn more about our solar system and beyond.