Simpler Version:
(1) Overall Purpose: The article aims to analyze a specific topic related to global finance or international economic environment. It seeks to contribute to the existing literature by presenting new theories or perspectives on the chosen topic.
(2) Theories or Concepts: The author presents various theories or concepts as a basis for the study, depending on the specific topic being discussed. These may include theories related to exchange rate determination, international capital budgeting, international financial markets, or the international monetary system.
(3) Validity of the Position: The validity of the author’s position depends on the strength of their arguments and evidence presented in the article. It is important to critically evaluate their reasoning, methodology, and data sources to assess the validity of their position.
(4) Conclusion and Existing Literature: The conclusion of the article should be evaluated in relation to the existing literature on the topic. It is important to assess whether the author’s findings and conclusions align with or contradict previous research.
(5) Approval or Disapproval of Theories: The article may approve or disapprove a particular theory depending on the research findings and conclusions. It is important to identify the specific theory or theories being discussed in the article and evaluate whether the author’s findings support or challenge those theories.
Same Version:
(1) Overall Purpose: The article aims to enhance analytical skills by critically reviewing journal articles and similar scientific works related to topics in global finance, international economic environment, international monetary system, international financial management, international financial markets, exchange rate determination, and international capital budgeting.
(2) Theories or Concepts: The author presents various theories or concepts as a basis for the study, depending on the specific topic being discussed. These may include theories related to exchange rate determination, international capital budgeting, international financial markets, or the international monetary system.
(3) Validity of the Position: The validity of the author’s position depends on the strength of their arguments and evidence presented in the article. It is important to critically evaluate their reasoning, methodology, and data sources to assess the validity of their position.
(4) Conclusion and Existing Literature: The conclusion of the article should be evaluated in relation to the existing literature on the topic. It is important to assess whether the author’s findings and conclusions align with or contradict previous research.
(5) Approval or Disapproval of Theories: The article may approve or disapprove a particular theory depending on the research findings and conclusions. It is important to identify the specific theory or theories being discussed in the article and evaluate whether the author’s findings support or challenge those theories.
More Complex Version:
(1) Overall Purpose and Analytical Skill Enhancement: The primary objective of this activity is to enable individuals to enhance their analytical skills by critically reviewing journal articles and similar scientific works pertaining to various topics in the field of global finance and international economic environment. By engaging in this exercise, individuals are expected to develop a deeper understanding of concepts related to international monetary systems, international financial management, international financial markets, exchange rate determination, and international capital budgeting.
(2) Theories and Concepts as a Basis for the Study: The author presents a comprehensive range of theories and concepts as a foundation for the study, depending on the specific topic being explored. These theories may encompass intricate models of exchange rate determination, complex frameworks for international capital budgeting, sophisticated theories of international financial markets, and intricate analyses of the international monetary system. The author’s selection of theories and concepts is aimed at providing a robust theoretical framework for the analysis and evaluation of the chosen topic.
(3) Evaluation of the Validity of the Author’s Position: The validity of the author’s position necessitates a meticulous examination of the arguments, evidence, and methodology presented in the article. A critical evaluation of the author’s reasoning, data sources, and research design is crucial in assessing the validity of their position. This evaluation should be conducted with a discerning eye, taking into account the complexity and intricacy of the subject matter.
(4) Conclusion in Light of Existing Literature: The conclusion of the article should be evaluated in relation to the existing literature on the topic. This evaluation requires a comprehensive understanding of the existing body of knowledge and an assessment of how the author’s findings and conclusions contribute to or challenge the existing literature. This analysis helps identify gaps in knowledge and areas for further research.
(5) Approval or Disapproval of Theories: The article may either approve or disapprove specific theories depending on the research findings and conclusions. It is essential to identify the particular theories being discussed in the article and evaluate whether the author’s findings support or challenge those theories. This analysis provides valuable insights into the implications of the article’s findings for the field of study and offers directions for future research.
